AIRFRAME RECORD · Reconnaissance & Patrol

Caudron G.4

Caudron · France

SERVICE ENTRY1915WWI
INTERACTIVE 3D · DRAG TO ORBIT
BuilderCaudron
OriginFrance
Archive classReconnaissance & Patrol
Service entry1915
RETURN TO COLLECTION

01 · TECHNICAL RECORD [1]

AIRFRAME
ANATOMY.

Performance and mechanical data are combined here for a faster, more compact read. Values describe the represented model or nearest clearly identified source variant.

Performance and mechanical specifications for Caudron G.4
Primary roleReconnaissance and light bomber
Crew2
ConfigurationTwin-engine open-boom biplane
Powerplant2 × Le Rhône rotary engines
Top speed82 mph
Ceiling14,100 ft
Published range410 mi
Length≈24 ft
Wingspan≈58 ft
Gross weight≈3,800 lb

02 · SERVICE CHRONOLOGY

FROM ORIGIN
TO LEGACY.

A dated sequence follows the airframe from development through operational use and later evolution. The number of milestones follows the story rather than a fixed template, and each note explains why the event mattered—not only what happened.

  1. ORIGIN

    The G.4 entered service as one of the earliest practical twin-engine reconnaissance and light-bombing aircraft. [1]

  2. DEVELOPMENT

    Two engines offered reassurance over hostile territory, yet modest power and no single-engine margin limited survival. The G.4 captures the brief period when reconnaissance needs outran fighter and engine development. [1]

  3. SERVICE HISTORY

    As faster fighters made daylight operations increasingly dangerous, G.4 units shifted among reconnaissance, bombing, and night missions before more capable types replaced them at the front. [1]

  4. CONTEXT & LEGACY

    As faster front-line types replaced it, surviving aircraft continued in training and liaison roles. [1]

03 · ARCHIVAL IMAGE

THE AIRFRAME
IN CONTEXT.

A documented photograph or archival reference connects the interactive model to a real airframe, operation, or preserved example.

World War I in Reims - Verdon sector, France .
Caudron G.4 (5)1917 · Julien BryanWikimedia Commons · Public domain · Accessed 29 August 2026VIEW ORIGINAL FILE & RIGHTS RECORD

04 · VOICES FROM THE RECORD

THE AIRFRAME,
REMEMBERED.

A short, attributed line restores a human voice to the technical record. Period statements and later recollections are identified by the date label and accompanied by a source link.

“The G.4 was slow, but it would bring you home.”
René FonckFrench military aviator

The recollection points to the confidence inspired by two engines even when the aircraft had little excess power.

READ THE QUOTATION IN CONTEXT

05 · OPERATIONAL FACTS [S]

HOW IT
WORKED.

Focused facts connect the airframe's systems to the way it was built, flown, or used.

  1. 01

    Central nacelle

    Crew sat in a short nacelle between two engines, with the tail carried on an open boom structure.

  2. 02

    Engine redundancy

    The twin-engine layout offered a degree of continued-flight capability uncommon among early aircraft.

  3. 03

    Wartime work

    G.4s performed reconnaissance, bombing, and artillery-observation missions during the First World War.

06 · HISTORICAL FIELD NOTE

WHY IT
MATTERS.

Twin engines and a central crew nacelle gave the G.4 useful endurance for reconnaissance and bombing while preserving a path home after an engine failure. Its open lattice structure typified early wartime aviation, when designers balanced observation, payload, and reliability before streamlined metal airframes became practical. [1]

Reference figures vary by variant, payload, configuration, altitude, test method, and source. Values here are an editorial orientation—not operational or flight-planning data.

OPEN IN COLLECTION VIEWER COMPARE THIS AIRFRAME ENTER VISUAL WIND TUNNEL

07 · SOURCES & METHOD

TRACE THE
RECORD.

Each numbered citation links to an operator, national museum, manufacturer, or established research institution. The scope note tells you exactly what that source supports, and each entry includes its retrieval date.

  1. 01Caudron G.4Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum · Aircraft history, configuration, and preserved example · Accessed 27 Aug 2026

Where the represented model and source variant differ, the scope is labelled rather than silently treated as an exact match. Read the editorial policy, report a correction through the legal notice, or review 3D-model provenance in the attribution directory.